Interesting observation, The label is strengthened when you look at the TV series “Sex plus the City”.

  • 0

Interesting observation, The label is strengthened when you look at the TV series “Sex plus the City”.

Category : Others

Interesting observation, The label is strengthened when you look at the TV series “Sex plus the City”.

The only guys those women had as real non-sexual buddies had been homosexual. Otherwise, they’d intercourse with all the males inside their life. Truly a type or sort of reverse sexist insult to males, really. Kinda like, straight guys are just advantageous to a very important factor. LOL

  • Reply to anonymous
  • Quote anonymous


Though it is just a label that homosexual males are far more feminine, whenever this might be true, females do feel nearer to them.

All homosexual guys are obviously better to trust as friends because they don’t have hidden sexual or romantic intentions when they talk to women, which is why women prefer them. As a female, we find the majority of my right male buddies have actually ulterior motives to the relationship.

  • Answer to Abby Blackburn
  • Quote Abby Blackburn

Yeah, this is the barrier

Yeah, this is the barrier some communicative men that are straight with females. But about themselves and can make the woman feel that her feelings will be respected, and not pressured, straight men can develop close friendships with women too if they are straightforward and open.

Of course, you can find both women and men whom dogmatically don’t believe this kind of relationship from a man that is straight straight girl can be done. But having said that, for a few who are able to develop this sorts of relationship, it may be satisfying. As an example, a person and a female in this sort of relationship who respect one another’s relationships they own making use of their other genuine intimate relationship can trade tips and insights to the other sex whether they have questions regarding their relationships. Needless to say, this takes an amount of readiness, safety, and genuine relationship that lots of individuals are perhaps maybe not effective at in a male-female relationship.

  • Respond to anonymous
  • Quote anonymous

Ulterior Motives, As fascinating as it might be to hypothesize concerning the precept of “heterosexual males having ulterior motives”

As as an issue in developing comfortable male-female relationships it’s, basically, a distorted projection laden with egocentrism, presumptions, stereotypes, and borderline misandry.

1. When developing friendships/relationships, people, males included don’t clearly state their intimate orientation. Certain, in some cases it may possibly be an understood information, however in many instances we run predicated on our presumptions which have equally as much of the possibility to be wrong, or at the least maybe perhaps perhaps not 100% accurate even as we presume them to be.

2. Did you ever hear of bisexuality? It is a genuine thing. And much more people (including male individuals) give consideration to on their own become bisexual than solely homosexual. A detail that rarely pops up in conversation until friendships/relationships are fairly more developed.

3. Have you ever heard of intimate fluidity? Any belief that the person is really a narrowly defined in a box/category this is certainly 100% exclusively _____ when it comes to their intimate experiences/attractions (whether within the past, current or future) is just a construction we make within our very own minds therefore we feel comfortable “defining” people or thinking into our big picture relationship schema that we know what they’re about in order to fit them. No matter what an individual states, tasks as well as exactly exactly what their real factual history was as much as this moment. Our overt reactions about our intimate passions/histories are subconsciously, and often consciously, edited for public consumption as well as the message you’re getting, regardless if clearly stated, might not really end up being the entire story/picture. The words don’t always mean what you think they mean in many cases. For instance, my dead grandfather (passed away at 92), ended up being hitched, 8 young ones (nearly 2 dozen grandkids) ended up being faithfully monogamous to my grandma for over 60 years and a proud, self-professed heterosexual (w/multiple non-heterosexual young ones, grandchildren) proved to have experienced a lover that is male 2 yrs while abroad into the armed forces before he got hitched. Which was perhaps perhaps not really a known reality he ever shared during his life time but had been discovered posthumously. Everybody was shocked, yet not shocked. Terms never capture the story that is whole.

Whilst the above also address assumptions/gender part stereotypes/presumptions/projections, etc.

Certain to my calling the “ulterior motives” idea a manifestation of egocentrism, presumptions, stereotypes, and borderline misandry.

4. There are lots of ulterior motives that drive the forming of relationships besides romance/sex. In the event that unstated potential of a romantic/sexual ulterior motive is a driving factor for whether or not a female can establish a comfy relationship with any guy informs us a great deal in regards to the girl and contains nothing to do with the person, and never necessarily even about truth. It is all predicated on assumptions and projections.

5. Explore sex borderline and stereotyping misandry. Just exactly how are women any different than males? A female is simply as most likely, or perhaps not most most likely, to possess romance/sex being a motive that is ulterior the formula for developing relationships with guys as the other way around. Let us maybe perhaps perhaps not make think otherwise.

6. I must laugh in the egocentrism included in this discussion that is whole. Exactly just just What would make any woman genuinely believe that any, needless to say every, heterosexual guy whom might start contact/friendship or a “relationship” (into the broadest usage of the definition of) is drawn to you so that their ulterior motive is romance/sex. Take a peek around. Many people are maybe perhaps perhaps not “that” hot or attractive that this would also be when you look at the forefront of the brain whenever new folks are saying hello. The truth is that in our day to day lives. Many people we all know, meet, and do form comfortable relationships with aren’t leads for romantic/sexual relationships. In the event that’s your filter or lens. You might be usually the one with the ulterior motives.

7. That intimate orientation is an element in whether or not you are able to begin a “comfortable” relationship with a guy that’s not through the first minute you meet an intimately sparked/dating sort of relationship. Will not bode well for the possible relationship success whenever you do find a guy with this spark.

  • Answer to Anonymous
  • Quote Anonymous

Intimate fluidity = bisexual

Feels like “sexual fluidity” is more or less bisexual. Whenever you can like both sexes then you’re bisexual. You should not compensate a word that is new BISEXUAL

Directly and men that are bisexual drawn to ladies so its not that difficult to think that they could befriend females to ultimately get intercourse

Leave a Reply