H4: Borrowing from the bank background have an optimistic influence on lenders’ conclusion to provide lending that are in keeping so you’re able to MSEs’ requirements

  • 0

H4: Borrowing from the bank background have an optimistic influence on lenders’ conclusion to provide lending that are in keeping so you’re able to MSEs’ requirements

Category : Others

H4: Borrowing from the bank background have an optimistic influence on lenders’ conclusion to provide lending that are in keeping so you’re able to MSEs’ requirements

In the context of digital credit, so it basis is actually influenced by numerous situations, plus social network, economic services, and exposure perception which consists of 9 evidence once the proxies. For this reason, in the event that prospective traders believe that potential consumers meet with the “trust” indicator, chances are they would-be considered to possess traders in order to provide in the exact same matter due to the fact proposed by the MSEs.

Hstep one: Web sites explore circumstances for enterprises possess a positive influence on lenders’ behavior to incorporate lendings that will be comparable to the needs of the brand new MSEs.

Hdos: Status operating situations keeps a confident affect this new lender’s choice to add a credit that’s in common into MSEs’ requisite.

H3: Control at the job financing have an optimistic effect on the latest lender’s choice to provide a credit that’s in common for the requires of one’s MSEs.

H5: Mortgage usage possess a confident influence on this new lender’s choice so you’re able to promote a financing that is in accordance towards the means away from new MSEs.

H6: Mortgage cost program has a positive influence on the fresh lender’s choice to provide a credit that’s in common toward MSEs’ criteria.

H7: Completeness regarding credit demands file keeps an optimistic effect on the fresh lender’s choice to add a lending that is in common so you can the MSEs’ demands.

H8: Credit reason enjoys a positive influence on this new lender’s decision so you can give a credit that’s in common so you’re able to MSEs’ need.

H9: Compatibility off loan dimensions and you may company you need enjoys a confident perception to your lenders’ choices to include credit that’s in accordance to help you the needs of MSEs.

3.step one. Type Gathering Analysis

The analysis uses secondary study and you will priple physique and you can topic for planning a questionnaire regarding factors you to definitely influence fintech to finance MSEs. The information is collected away from books studies one another journal content, book chapters, legal proceeding, earlier in the day look while some. At the same time, first information is necessary to get empirical analysis off MSEs on the the factors that influence him or her into the acquiring borrowing through fintech financing considering the requisite.

First investigation has been amassed in the shape of an internet survey during inside the four provinces in Indonesia: Jakarta, West Coffees, Central Java, Alaska auto title loans East Coffee and Yogyakarta. Paid survey testing used non-likelihood testing having purposive testing approach on 500 MSEs being able to access fintech. Of the shipment from surveys to any or all respondents, there are 345 MSEs have been prepared to fill in this new survey and whom obtained fintech lendings. Yet not, just 103 participants provided complete responses which means just data offered by the her or him is actually good for further research.

step 3.dos. Studies and Adjustable

Research that was amassed, edited, right after which assessed quantitatively in line with the logistic regression design. Centered changeable (Y) is actually created inside a binary trend of the a question: do brand new financing received away from fintech meet with the respondent’s criterion otherwise not? Within this framework, this new subjectively suitable respond to was given a rating of 1 (1), and almost every other was given a rating off zero (0). Your chances variable will be hypothetically determined by numerous details just like the demonstrated during the Table dos.

Note: *p-really worth 0.05). This is why the fresh new model works with the fresh observational study, that’s suitable for then research.

The first interesting thing to note is that the internet use activity (X1) has a negative effect on the probability gaining expected loan size (see Table 2). This implies that the frequency of using internet to shop online can actually reduce an opportunity for MSEs to obtain fintech loans. It is possible as fintech lenders recognize that such consumptive behavior of MSEs could reduce their ability to secure loan repayment. Secondly, borrowers’ position in business (X2) is not significant statistically at = 10%. However, regression coefficient of the variable has a positive sign, indicating that being the owner of SME provides a greater opportunity to obtain fintech loans that are equivalent to their needs. Conversely, if a business person is not the owner of an SME then it becomes difficult to obtain a fintech loan. The result is similar to Stefanie & Rainer (2010) who found that information concerning personal characteristics, such as professional status was an important consideration for investors in fintech lending. Unlike traditional financial institutions, fintech lending is not a direct lender but an agent that acts as a liaison between the investors and the borrowers. It means that the availability of information about personal qualifications is important for investors to minimize the risk of online-based lending. A research by Ding et al. (2019) on 178, 000 online lending lists in China, also revealed that the reputation of the borrower is the main signal in making fintech lending decisions.


Leave a Reply